LlamaLab vs Lexitas

Lexitas is the superior choice for firms that want court reporting, depositions, process service and record retrieval from one national vendor. LlamaLab excels as a specialist medical evidence platform best suited for plaintiff firms where records decide the case, particularly records back in 4 days on average instead of a 30 to 45 day standard, reverse provider discovery that finds treatment clients never listed and clinical proof-of-injury qualification at mass tort scale.

What is record retrieval?
4-day average retrieval
AI provider discovery
Clinical qualification

Purpose-built for rapid turnaround and scale

Lexitas is a national litigation-support company with court reporting, record retrieval, process service, and legal staffing under one roof.

Side-by-side comparison of LlamaLab and Lexitas across retrieval speed, provider discovery, case qualification, pricing, and security.
CapabilityLlamaLabLexitas
Category focusAI-native medical evidence for plaintiff firmsFull-suite litigation support (records is one service)
Track recordTrusted by 250+ law firms; AI-native since 2024Litigation support since 1987
Retrieval turnaround4 days on average; 30 to 40% of records back same day30 to 45 day average turnaround (per Lexitas)
Facility relationshipsHealthcare-to-healthcare entity; direct facility partnerships move requests past standard vendor queuesDirect facility partnerships not publicly documented
Provider discoveryReverse search runs insurance claims data to find providers clients never listed; 4M+ facility network4M+ provider/custodian relationships; retrieves named providers
Case qualificationLicensed clinical team qualifies proof of injury in under 7 daysRecord Insights AI medical chronology / summaries
Portfolio / AI queriesPlain-English queries for complex medical records across the entire portfolioPer-matter chronologies and summaries
Pricing & recoverabilityPublic pricing: $50 per facility request, retrieval-only billing, fully recoverable, optional pay-only-for-qualified-cases modelCustom; bundled across litigation-support services
Primary audiencePersonal injury & mass tort plaintiff firms wanting speed, scale, and medical-grade technologyLaw firms, insurance, and corporate legal
HIPAA / securityHIPAA-compliant under BAA, SOC 2 Type 2, bank-level encryptionSOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, 256-bit encryption

Competitor details come from public company materials (see sources). Figures a vendor does not publish are marked "not publicly disclosed."

Where Lexitas stands out

All-in-one litigation support

Court reporting, depositions, process service, legal staffing, and record retrieval from one vendor, which suits firms that want fewer vendors to manage.

National scale since 1987

1,300+ team members and 40+ locations, including six dedicated record-retrieval locations with 300+ retrieval staff.

Record Insights AI chronology

An AI-enabled medical chronology that summarizes records by condition, date, and body system, with an Excel export.

Enterprise security posture

SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA-compliant processes with up to 256-bit encryption in transit.

Firms evaluating Lexitas often cite the published 30 to 45 day retrieval average as the part that still slows plaintiff timelines.

Where LlamaLab stands out

4-day average retrieval

Records come back in 4 days on average, and 30 to 40% arrive the same day. On Camp Lejeune, the same system cut VA record retrieval from 90 days to 4.

Direct facility relationships

LlamaLab submits requests as a healthcare organization, and direct hospital and facility partnerships move those requests past standard vendor queues. That access is why records can come back the same day.

Reverse provider discovery

Reverse search runs insurance claims data against a proprietary network of 4M+ facilities and finds the specialists, urgent-care visits, and prior treatment clients forget, so requests stop depending on client memory alone.

Clinical case qualification

A licensed clinical team confirms proof of injury alongside page verification, supported by clinical AI that scored 98% on physician board exams. On a PFAS portfolio, LlamaLab qualified 10,000 cases in three weeks at an 84% qualification rate.

Mass tort portfolio intelligence

Query thousands of cases in plain English to qualify and re-qualify claimants. On the last large engagement, docket queries surfaced 5 to 10 percent more clients eligible for other litigations.

Recoverable, retrieval-only pricing

Pricing is public: $50 per facility request, with no platform, license, or technology fees, so every dollar stays a recoverable case expense instead of firm overhead. Optional models let firms pay only for the cases that qualify.

Case management integrations

LlamaLab integrates with Litify, SmartAdvocate, Needles, and Clio, and any other case management system can connect through our API, so retrieval starts from the matter.

Feature by feature

Retrieval speed

Lexitas cites a 30 to 45 day average turnaround for record retrieval. LlamaLab gets records back in 4 days on average, with 30 to 40% back same day. On a docket where records gate filing, that difference compounds across every case: on Camp Lejeune, faster retrieval let one firm cut its budgeted case timeline from 2 years to 6 months.

Breadth vs depth

Lexitas spreads across court reporting, depositions, staffing and records; retrieval is one service among many. LlamaLab does one job: the fastest path from a signed client to qualified medical evidence. Provider discovery and clinical review exist for that job and nothing else.

Chronologies vs qualification

Record Insights produces AI chronologies that organize what was retrieved. LlamaLab's licensed clinical team goes further: proof of injury confirmed or declined, in under 7 days, so your team knows which cases to work.

Pricing and recoverability

Lexitas prices custom and bundles records within its broader suite. LlamaLab publishes pricing at $50 per facility request and bills retrieval only, so you know the cost up front and recover it case by case.

Pricing comparison

Lexitas prices custom and bundles records within its broader litigation-support suite. LlamaLab does records only and bills retrieval only, so the cost is transparent and fully recoverable per case.

LlamaLab

  • $50 per facility request for medical and billing records, published publicly
  • Case setup fee of $150 on Basic, waived on Unlimited
  • Retrieval-only billing stays a recoverable case expense, not firm overhead
  • Optional models let firms pay only for cases that qualify
See full public pricing

Lexitas

Custom; bundled across litigation-support services

Per public materials at the time of writing (see sources).

Which one fits your firm?

When to choose Lexitas

  • You want one vendor for court reporting, depositions, and records, and a 30 to 45 day retrieval average fits your timelines.
  • You need litigation support beyond medical records.
  • AI medical chronologies (Record Insights) cover your review needs.

When to choose LlamaLab

  • A 30 to 45 day retrieval standard is too slow for your caseload.
  • You need provider discovery to identify unlisted facilities rather than relying solely on manual request forms.
  • You want a clinical qualify-or-decline decision on each case.
  • You want retrieval billed at a published rate you can recover.
  • Funders or co-counsel need case timelines they can budget against.

Real impact across major mass torts

How firms use LlamaLab to process thousands of cases faster.

Camp Lejeune
4 days
avg VA record retrieval
  • VA records delivered in 4 days on average vs. 90+ day industry standard
  • Cut one firm's budgeted processing time from 2 years to 6 months
View Interactive Story
PFAS Litigation
30,000+
cases processed
  • Processed 10,000 cases from no records to evidence packages in 3 weeks with an 84% qualification rate
  • Discovered exposure records linking clients to contaminated water sources
Depo-Provera
+20%
qualification rate increase
  • Raised proof-of-injury rate 20% by correcting teams' misinterpretation of records
  • Retrieved medical records going back 25+ years

LlamaLab vs Lexitas, answered

For plaintiff medical record retrieval, yes. Lexitas is the superior choice for firms that want court reporting, depositions, and records from one national vendor. LlamaLab is the default when records decide the case: 4 days on average against the 30 to 45 day standard Lexitas cites, plus provider discovery and clinical qualification.

Lexitas is a broad litigation-support company where records are one of many services. LlamaLab does medical evidence only: retrieval, provider discovery, and clinical case qualification for plaintiff and mass tort firms.

Lexitas prices custom and bundled. LlamaLab publishes pricing at $50 per facility request, retrieval-only with no platform fee. The cost stays transparent, and your firm recovers it from settlement instead of absorbing it as overhead.

For the medical-records portion of a case, yes. LlamaLab does not provide court reporting, depositions, or process serving, so firms relying on Lexitas for those would keep a separate vendor for them.

Firms that want a single national vendor across court reporting, depositions, process service, staffing, and records, and whose record-review needs are met by AI chronologies rather than clinical qualification.

See the difference on your own cases

Submit your first case free and compare LlamaLab's speed, provider discovery, and clinical qualification against what you use today.